Author Archives: admin

Competition Commission imposes highest-ever penalty for deceptive marketing practices

April 14, 2016

Although the Competition Act 2010 does not cover the concept of parasitic copying or copycat packaging, in its recent order against Dawn Foods, the Competition Commission broadened the scope of deceptive marketing practices – which are strictly prohibited under Section 10 of the Competition Act 2010 – by recognising unfair competition through the practice of parasitic copying and copycat packaging for the first time in Pakistan.
Read more

Highlights of the Draft Amendment to China’s Anti-Unfair Competition Law: Abuse of a Comparatively Advantageous Position

March 18, 2016

Overview

On February 25th 2016, the State Council published the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (Draft Amendment) (the law hereinafter the “AUCL”, the draft amendment hereinafter the“Draft”) for public comments. Certain issues have arisen since the implementation of AUCL in 1993, for example, new types of unfair competitive behaviors have been under-regulated and the penalties do not have enough deterrent effects. Also, since 2008, the enactment of the Antitrust-Monopoly Law (“AML”) has resulted in overlaps and inconsistent standards of application.
Read more

China proposes a revamp to its Anti-Unfair Competition Law – Changes relevant to companies’ business practices

March 14, 2016

On 25 February 2016, the Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council issued a new draft of the amended Anti-Unfair Competition Law (“Draft”) for public comment. The Draft entails an important overhaul of the current law, which was first enacted in 1993. It aims to bring the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (“AUCL”) in line with more recent domestic legislation (e.g., the Trademark Law and the Anti-Monopoly Law), harmonize the Chinese law with international legal standards, codify the majority view in Chinese jurisprudence, and modernize the AUCL through the adoption of an array of brand-new principles and provisions.
Read more

Competition Commission reject complaints of unfair practices against Ola, Uber

February 15, 2016

With regard to allegations of unfair business practices against Uber, CCI said the fluctuating market share figures of the various players show that the competitive landscape in the relevant market is quite vibrant and dynamic.

Competition Commission has rejected allegations of unfair business ways against taxi hailing apps Ola and Uber after finding no evidence of anti-competitive practices by them in the national capital.
Read more

Frankfurt court bans app’s discount taxi rides

January 19, 2016

Taxi-hailing app mytaxi will no longer be allowed to offer customers 50 percent off trips, a court in Frankfurt has decided, saying that the deals represent unfair competition.

Daimler subsidiary mytaxi has regularly offered 50-percent deals over short time spans to interest more customers in booking their rides using the app.
Read more

Decision On The Effective Date Of The Amendment Of The Unfair Competition Prevention Act

By the Cabinet decision of October 9, 2015, the Partial Amendment of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, which was enacted on July 3, 2015, will come into force on January 1, 2016. However, the amendment to extend the statute of limitations relating to bringing injunction claims against an unauthorized use of trade secrets to 20 years is already in force.
Read more

Competition fines SFR, SRR for unfair off-net call prices

France’s Competition Authority has imposed a EUR 10.7 million fine on mobile operator SFR and its Reunion subsidiary, SRR, for unfair competition in the enterprise market. The antitrust regulator found that there was too large a difference between prices charged for on-net and off-net calls. This pricing behaviour took place for 12 years in Reunion and for 6 years in Mayotte. The decision follows a EUR 46 million fine set in June 2014 for the same practice in the consumer market. 
Read more